Shroud of Turin
Shroud of Turin,
a mysterious artifact of uncertain origin, has been a
source of controversy since the Middle Ages, believers adamantly
maintaining that the approximately 14 foot long linen garment bearing
an image (both front and back) of a bearded 6 ft tall man was in fact
the burial shroud of Jesus Christ, skeptics equally adamant disagree.
1389 capitalizing on the shrouds notoriety, Geoffrey de Charney
overlord of the French town of Lirey exhibited the alleged burial cloth
for money. He quickly amassed a sizable fortune and in the process the
jealousy of neighboring towns, many of which had their own
religious relics on display.The matter came to a head when referring to
the shroud, Pierre d’Arcis the Bishop of Troyes, France, a skeptic,
perhaps jealous himself or merely annoyed with the whole matter, quoted
a predecessor in a passionate letter to Pope Clement VII at Avignon
“though the image is cunningly painted . . . it is a work of human
skill and not miraculously wrought.” Not wishing to step on any toes
the move engendered a limited response from the Pontiff. Indeed for
centuries the Catholic Church remained officially neutral, at times
even mute on the subject, until in 1998 following comprehensive and
impartial scientific study the issue was finally resolved. Turin’s
Cardinal Ballestrero the shroud’s custodian revealed that simultaneous
testing utilizing accelerator mass spectrometry by Britain’s Oxford
University, the University of Arizona and Switzerland’s Federal
Institute of Technology had carbon dated a small swatch from the
artifact. The results were a time of origin between 1260 and 1390 CE.
The date of origin aside, the shroud still remains an object of mystery:
It is imprinted with the image of a life-sized crucified human body.
It was created in a time before photography existed yet the image bears
an uncanny resemblance to a photographic negative.
is no evidence that it was painted (even utilizing modern scientific
techniques scientists can’t agree on how the image was fashioned).
the means of the shroud’s creation are resolved and perhaps even after
that the faithful will continue to view it with awe and veneration, the
very existence of this remarkable artifact seemingly miracle enough.
Researchers from Italy’s National Agency for New Technologies, Energy
and Sustainable Economic Development after spending years trying to
duplicate the shroud’s markings have concluded (November 2011) that
only something akin to ultraviolet lasers, a technology far beyond the
capability of medieval forgers, could have created them (the markings)
leading to new suggestions that the imprint was created by a flash of
supernatural light during the resurrection.
investigations reveal that a short intense burst of ultraviolet
radiation can color a linen cloth so as to reproduce some but not all
of the characteristics of the body likeness found on the Turin Shroud
but caution against equating that fact with talk of miracles.
one talks about a flash of light being able to color a piece of linen
in the same way as the shroud, discussion inevitably touches on things
such as miracles,” said Professor Paolo Di Lazzaro, who led the study.
“But as scientists, we were concerned only with verifiable scientific
processes. We hope our results can open up a philosophical and
Copyright © 2006-2017
All rights reserved